Google open service again in China

BEIJING - Google, Friday, stating that its services will be normal again could be blocked in China after a few moments ago. Google and the Chinese government censor had fallen out related activities and cyberattack by the Chinese government on the users of web services giant American.

Thursday, the search engine services, Google Ads and Google Mobile has gone through a full blockade of the country with the largest online marketplace in the world, 420 million internet users. Some news and pictures partially blocked (partially blocked).

Blocking indicates that Beijing is not satisfied with Google although there are changes made to ensure the company's license renewal Google in China. "Our machines are capable of estimating the blocking high," explains Google in a report by email to AFP.

"What happened last night is a relatively small block. But now users in China can access it normally," he added. In response, the AFP and then try to access Google in mainland China who only occasionally can be accessed normally.

The giant IT companies are also reminded that access at google.com / PRC / report.html is not real-time tool. But will be updated at least once a day.

Gmail is the only service from Google that can be accessed as normal without any blocking. Its another thing with YouTube, Google's other products are prohibited entry into China many years ago.

Intel Celeron processor will retire?

SINGAPORE - Sophisticated technology that when eaten any time of course will become obsolete. It also goes on one of the products of Intel, Celeron. At the beginning, Intel Celeron handle customers, by bringing processors 'cost effective' special laptop and home computer.

But with the emergence of a new family category as Intel's Core can not be pursued Celeron. Based on the fact that, Intel Celeron will decide who tilled memuseumkan Intel products since 1998. Reportedly, Intel will stop the processor tasks in 2011 gradually.

Intel realistically assess the steps to be taken. Observers around the development of information technology and speculate laptops Intel has a new claim to prepare "The rumors were not true, Intel had no plans to remove the Celeron brand in 2011," said Barry Sum, as quoted from Computer World, last weekend.

In fact, the latest price list, Intel still include a new line of Celeron family. Desktop processor with a frequency of 2.4GHz and 2.6GHz is priced at around USD 43-53 or approximately Rp. 430-550

Intel has been relying on a number of brands for their main processors since the early 1990s, when the lineage of his predecessors to produce a Pentium 486 processor. Since then the company continues to add other brands, including Xeon, Itanium, Celeron, Centriono, Atom and Core.

Xeon and Itanium is Intel's brand specifically for the category of server processors, while Intel's Core is a major mainstay for laptops and computers. While the Atom family is designed for small laptops low price, aka netbook and also a small kind of mobile devices.

Then as usual, sitting in the category of the cheapest Celeron Intel processor category, located just below the Pentium. Intel currently sells eight versions of the Pentium, all in a kind of dual-core chips with speeds ranging between 2.6 GHz to 3.2 GHz. Intel sells processors for each unit ranging from 64 dollars up to 87 dollars in a single package containing a minimum purchase of 1,000 units.

Detailed Data 100 Million Facebookers Download and Published

Would this be considered a serious threat in data security at Facebook? Recently the personal details of 100 million facebookers - the term for Facebook users - has been collected and published on the internet by an IT security consultant, Ron Bowles. He uses a code to scan a Facebook profile, collect data that is hidden by the owner's privacy settings.

The list, which has been divided into the public as a downloadable file. In that dafar terdapatURL every Facebook user profiles which can be searched, their names as well as its unique ID.

Bowles said he had not published the data for the purpose of attacking, but to highlight the issue of privacy. However, Facebook confirmed, all the data it nonetheless has become public information because the owner, according to their privacy settings, deliberately letting displayed.

Now the file has been spreading fast in the corners of cyberspace. On the Pirate Bay, the largest file sharing sites in the world, 100 million facebookers list was distributed and has been downloaded by more than 1000 users.

A confessed 'that appeared under the name lusifer69, described the list with the phrase' awesome and a little scary ". However, the defense pitched a statement quoted by the BBC, Thursday (29 / 7), Facebook states information in the list can be freely accessed online.

"People who use Facebook, have their own information and have the right to share only what they want, with the people they want and whenever they want," the statement said.

"In this case, the information that has been approved for publication have been collected by a researcher and spread on Google, Bing and other search engines also exist on Facebook. The statement also asserted," There is no private data that can be accessed or compromised, "

However, an observer from Privacy International, Simon Davis, a kind of example that the experiment mengetakan for Facebook warning that something like that, even worse can happen. "Facebook should anticipate this attack and make steps to prevent it," says Simon.

"It's very comforting to know a company hundreds of technicians circuitry can not imagine magnitude of this problem. Moreover appeared many opinions that said the attitude tends ignore Facebook," he added.

He also said that the data pengumpulk use privacy settings in Facebook are confusing. "People do not fully understand the privacy settings and this is the result," he said.

Earlier this year, appeared badari protests from the hassle of setting up the site user's privacy. In response, Facebook took out a more simplified privacy controls.

Facebook has privacy settings that make the public for some user information published and accessible. Facebookers also must make a conscious choice to keep or get rid of these general settings.